Dragon Age: The Veilguard Faces Dire Future as Gaider Warns It Died Early
No matter where you land on Dragon Age: The Veilguard, it’s hard to look at the game nearly two years after launch and argue it succeeded. It didn’t spark the kind of breakout momentum fans hoped for, sales didn’t match expectations, and its performance has likely dealt a serious blow to the future of the Dragon Age franchise.
Key takeaways
- Nearly two years after release, Dragon Age: The Veilguard is widely framed as a failure due to weak sales and limited impact.
- People close to BioWare have pointed to development difficulties and publisher involvement from Electronic Arts as major obstacles.
- Dragon Age creator David Gaider argues the project was more “set up” by Electronic Arts than damaged by internal issues.
- Gaider says he personally wouldn’t play the game because he knows “too much” about what happened behind the scenes.
- He claims Electronic Arts imposed sales expectations that can doom a title regardless of quality.
David Gaider’s view: the project was doomed from the start
In an interview with PC Gamer, David Gaider shared his perspective on The Veilguard and explained that he has no intention of playing it. His reasoning is that he understands too much about the internal process—information that, in his view, reframes the game as a project already heading toward failure.
Gaider describes The Veilguard as effectively “doomed,” claiming Electronic Arts “handicapped” BioWare in ways that couldn’t be undone. In other words, he believes the publisher’s involvement was the deciding factor, outweighing problems that may have originated within development itself.
Gaider also previously commented that it would be an “interesting” challenge to bring Dragon Age back, implying that the franchise faces a long road if it returns at all.
Why Gaider blames EA more than BioWare
Gaider’s core argument is that Electronic Arts did more than simply influence development—it actively pressured the studio into conditions designed to produce failure. He states that, based on what he’s been told, this is exactly what happened: the game didn’t meet expectations on the creative side, and it also didn’t deliver commercially.
He further claims that this is a pattern EA leans into. According to Gaider, the publisher demands a specific sales level, and if a title misses that mark, it doesn’t matter how good the game is from a creative standpoint. If the game underperforms, Gaider argues it’s treated as “essentially dead,” which turns performance metrics into a verdict rather than a target.
Gaider has made similar criticisms in the past, repeatedly describing EA’s role as a major reason Dragon Age has been handled unfairly. He suggests the franchise didn’t get the treatment it should have because of Electronic Arts’ alleged incompetence and its apparent preference for another BioWare RPG pillar, Mass Effect. While it’s not possible to know precisely what EA did behind the scenes, Gaider’s position is that the Dragon Age team never really had a fair chance to succeed.
Subscribe to the newsletter for inside game industry analysis
Gaider has gone on record to blame EA for the fate of Dragon Age plenty of times in the past, claiming that the series has been unjustly treated before due to EA’s incompetence and its preference for BioWare’s other big RPG series, Mass Effect. We won’t know exactly what EA was doing to the Dragon Age team, but if Gaider is to be believed, it never really stood a chance to begin with.
